The graphs depict average monthly expenditure on children's plays and number of children's contribution in three types of sports between 2008 to 2014
Spending on sports incresed througout the period, started from 20 pounds per month per child ended at more than 30 pounds in 2014. Between this period average spents were 25 pounds and 27 pounds, respectivelly in 2010 and in 2012.
While average monthly expenditure incresed, child perticipent's number in most of the sports also incresed. Initially in 2008 nearly 8 millions children played footaball. Later with a small downfall number crossed 8 millions in 2014. On the other. Same perticapant's number for Athletics also shows similer trend but number increased exponentially and reached 5 millions between 2010 and 2012. At the end in 2014 the number slightly decreased from 5 millions. On the other hand Swimming showed continuous improvement throughout the period, started from nearly 2 million and with a steady increment in reached more than 3 million at the end.
Overall, the number of perticipant not grew according to the amount of expenditure, which increased continuosly.
- The graphs below show the average monthly expenditure on children's sports and participation in different sports in UK from 2008 to 2014. 78
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and ma 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 965.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36111111111 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85048728778 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588888888889 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 260.1 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 71.709413608 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.5 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.9 5.23603664747 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263293512636 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.089926798965 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10389129576 0.0843802449381 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174512784143 0.15604864568 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.145631899309 0.0819641961636 178% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.51 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.