The charts illustrate the proportion of audiences coming to cinemas in Australia as well as its frequency and cinema visits for different age groups from 1996 to 2000.
It can be seen clearly in the table that there was significant progress in number of attendance in the period of 1996-1997. Starting from merely 62% of citizens in the first year, it was up to 72% of Australians who were keen on going to the cinemas, which respectively corresponded to the rates of 10.3 and 11.1 of frequency. Since 1997, the datas had changed slightly that fluctuated from 70% to 72%, especially it was the same in 1997,1998 and 2000 with 72%. Besides, average cinema visits were similar in 2 years (1998 and 2000) with 8.3.
Meanwhile, the line graph tends to show a predisposition of four age groups coming to cinemas in which there has been a coincidence in their growth during the duration shown. Although people seemed to go less when they got older, the figures all rose between 1996 and 1997, then dropped until 1998 before increased back in 1999 yet had another shrink by 2000. Among them, the peak stayed at around 23 for the age 14-24 and nailed at the bottom of 10, which was the rate of the oldest age group (above 50).
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 95
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The graphs below give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010 and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010 89
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The charts below give information about attendance at entertainment venues and admission prices to those venues in 2009 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 226, Rule ID: ON_GOING[1]
Message: Did you mean 'ongoing'?
Suggestion: ongoing
... up to 72% of Australians who were keen on going to the cinemas, which respectively corr...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, if, then, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1001.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59174311927 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46963292358 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 106.607317073 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642201834862 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.220026199 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.0 112.824112599 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252587195376 0.215688989381 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113940446569 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114750758762 0.0843802449381 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.198214817384 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101294894435 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.93 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.