The graphs below show the number of men and women in full and part-time employment in Australia between 1973 and 1993.
The line chart compares the proportion of males and females engaged in part-time and full-time employment in 1973 and 1993. The spectacular feature of the chart is a surge in the number of part-time workers while a decrease in the proportion of regular workers.
Regarding the full-time workers, rates of males were generally ahead of the females counterparts. More than 80% of the males 20-60 age were involved in a whole day working while except 19-21 age, less than 50% women involved in the full shifts and it collapsed with the decrement in age.
Switching to the limited time shifts, women were leading as contrasted to the men equivalent. In 1973, only a small proportion of males were engaged in part-time work while this number elevated to one-fourth proportion after two decades. However, around 5% males remained in the short intervals of work of all ages in 1993. In addition, females of 30-50 preferred to work in small intervals more as compared to the others.
Overall, maximum males were employed in full day shifts while females in part-time work.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-13 | dilipkarki | 73 | view |
| 2017-06-20 | Sneg | 59 | view |
| 2017-03-09 | Jamalin | 38 | view |
| 2017-01-26 | Stephanie Kaushal | 67 | view |
- The diagrams below show the development of the horse over a period of 40 million years 70
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ntrasted to the men equivalent. In 1973, only a small proportion of males were en...
^^
Line 5, column 398, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...eferred to work in small intervals more as compared to the others. Overall, max...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, regarding, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 895.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64595773784 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519553072626 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 273.6 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5762164246 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.4444444444 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.23603664747 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246801228864 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119243561409 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869596293762 0.0843802449381 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.17378742265 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0731763814656 0.0819641961636 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.