The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16-59 age groups as per their education level.
The given bar graphs depict the information about the weekly income earning by graduates and under graduates genders according to their age groups. The data is celebrated in euros.
It can be seen that the maximum males was earned near about 700 euros, and the minimum males had been earned 100 euros. However, the graduates men had been earned near about 400 euros which which was 25-29 age, groups whereas, the non graduates men was earned 350 euros. In addition to this the graduates men had been received 425 euros who was 30-39 year age, but the non graduates men was gressed 400 euros.
As for as trend was concerned the maximum femalsmes was earned 300 euros, and the minimum females had been earned 100 euros. Moreever, the graduates women was earned 250 euros in the age of 20-24 whereas, the non-graduates females had been earned 200 euros.
Overall, it is evident that the men had been more earned euros in both categories and women was less earned than men.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-09-25 | Raman Preet kaur | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-26 | manpreet kaurs | 79 | view |
| 2018-07-06 | Love kaler | 57 | view |
| 2018-07-05 | Amarbir singh | 81 | view |
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- Nowadays people throw away old things and adapt new things. Do the disadvantages of throwaway society outweigh any possible economic advantages? 78
- The graphs below show the weekly earnings of men and women in euros for the 16 59 age groups as per their education level 57
- Some people say that computer games are bad for childrenby all means while others believe that these games are contributing to childrens development. 67
- The circular chart depicts show the main reasons of land degradation.illustrates tbe affected degrated land in three main causes of during in the year of 1990.it can be shows the percentum. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 185, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: which
...en had been earned near about 400 euros which which was 25-29 age, groups whereas, the non ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, whereas, as for, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 13.0 33.7804878049 38% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 807.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74705882353 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19956743152 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 83.0 106.607317073 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488235294118 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1192166057 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.875 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213067597043 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115436164429 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0635122047124 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15925785825 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249261337273 0.0819641961636 30% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.37 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.