The two pie charts represent how spending habits varied in the US between two time periods, 1971 and 2001.
In total the amount of money spent on food, petrol, furniture and books in 1971 decreased over the period.By contrast, money spent on cars, restaurants and computers increased.Money spent on cars and food showed the most significant changes.The other items varied less significantly in terms of expenditure over time .
Money spent on food changed the most over the 30 year time period, decreasing by 30% from 1971 to 2001. In contrast to decreased expenditure on food, money spent on cars increased by 21% a substantial difference.The next biggest change was with regards to money spent on computers which increase by 10% over the three decades.In addition ,money spent on eating out at restaurants doubled from 7% to 14%.
Finally, banks decreased by 5% and furniture decreased very slightly by1% from 1971 to 2001.
In summary,expenditure in the United States over the three decade period differed between the various items with food and cars showing the greatest variance
- Some people believe the benefits of tourism outweigh the problems it creates in particular place. Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 93
- The graphs show changes in spending habits of people in UK between 1971 and 2001. write a report to a university lecturer describing the data. 73
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 69
- The two graphs show the main sources of energy in the USA in the 1980s and the 1990s. 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 106, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: By
...books in 1971 decreased over the period.By contrast, money spent on cars, restaura...
^^
Line 2, column 176, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Money
...rs, restaurants and computers increased.Money spent on cars and food showed the most ...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 241, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...ood showed the most significant changes.The other items varied less significantly ...
^^^
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cant changes.The other items varied less significantly in terms of expenditure ov...
^^
Line 2, column 317, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...cantly in terms of expenditure over time . Money spent on food changed the most o...
^^
Line 3, column 59, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d changed the most over the 30 year time period, decreasing by 30% from 1971 to 2...
^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...creased by 21% a substantial difference.The next biggest change was with regards to...
^^^
Line 3, column 327, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
... increase by 10% over the three decades.In addition ,money spent on eating out at ...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...y 10% over the three decades.In addition ,money spent on eating out at restaurants...
^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , expenditure
...htly by1% from 1971 to 2001. In summary,expenditure in the United States over the three dec...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous items with food and cars showing the greatest variance
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, in addition, in contrast, in summary, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19886363636 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93639685768 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556818181818 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => OK
Sentence length SD: 93.877579858 43.030603864 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 152.5 112.824112599 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.3333333333 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.8333333333 5.23603664747 207% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 11.0 1.69756097561 648% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.115981311997 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0789313254716 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.052760339183 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0822271634758 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0508456173385 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.2329268293 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.