The graphs show percentage of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features.
The depicted table illustrates the proportion of mobile phone proprietor using a plethora of mobile phone features.
Overall, it is clear that most of the people's had used to make calls, which represents the highest trend in all three respective years. Whereas, the least number of masses seem to use video recording throughout the period.
To initiate, the majority of people's had experienced the highest trend in taking photos, peaking from 66 percent in 2006 to exactly 76 percent in 2010. Likewise, 100 percent of folks seem to have used a mobile phone for making calls which remained stable in 2008 but seems to decline slowly in 2010, at 99 percent. Moreover, nearly three-quarters proportion of people was using a cell phone for texting messages which slightly increased well over three-quarters in 2010.
On the contrary, the most marked change is seen in searching the internet, rising from 0 percent in 2006 to exactly three-quarters ratio in 2010. Furthermore, playing games had shown certain fluctuation. Whereas, playing music as well as recording videos had experienced enormous internet throughout the given period. However, recording videos is undoubtedly the lowest trend as compared to others.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-10 | Milan karki | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-04 | LyleDUO | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about the most common sports played in New Zealand in 2002. 61
- Writing task 1 11
- The diagram below shows the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960. 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The table below shows the primary funding sources of international students in the US during the years 2003 04 and 2013 14 Write a 150 word report for a university lecturer describing the data and make comparisons where relevant 39
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 137, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...st trend in all three respective years. Whereas, the least number of masses seem to use...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, well, whereas, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1034.0 965.302439024 107% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35751295337 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8426100136 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59067357513 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.057157838 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.4 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.9 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189127272736 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798463216189 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141748081164 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165551691588 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.187275700061 0.0819641961636 228% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.2329268293 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.