A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or in the countryside.
There are three ways that the government can solve the problem of growing population. I believe that the government should solve this problem by building homes in the countryside.
Firstly, rapidly increasing population is one of the big issues and I feel the government should attempt to solve it via movement of people to homes built in the countryside, because the countryside is always less sophisticated than the cities. Therefore, governments which have a problem of a growing population should try to put some basic fundamentals like hospitals, schools, universities, and government branches in areas that can be accessed by everyone.
Secondly, putting higher education facilities in the countryside would appeal to people because in reality, some people would move from cities to the countryside to get a higher education. Thus, city populations would decrease as people move to the countryside, and not because people are emigrating to other countries. Scientists said that around the world, the population problem can be addressed by creating higher education.
In addition, opening up job opportunities in the countryside would be a major solution to the problem of growing population because people who want a job will go anywhere to get one, even to the countryside. For example, some companies work in the countryside, especially if the company has the industry to produce products (goods). companies that operate in the countryside will have less problems with expansion, because the countryside will be less expensive.
To sum up, opening up job opportunities and offering higher education in the countryside will rapidly solve the problem of growing population.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-19 | khaledsaed | 67 | view |
| 2019-03-19 | khaledsaed | 73 | view |
- A growing population is a big problem in many countries. Should the government provide new homes in the cities or in the countryside. 67
- Some people prefer to plan activities for their free time very carefully.Others disagree. Discuss both views, and give you opinion. 61
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Students should take out student loans to avoid working while studying. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 61
- Some say that the most important thing about being rich is that one has the opportunity to help other. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 73
- Why do people help each other 69
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 336, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'fundamentals'.
Suggestion: fundamentals
...owing population should try to put some basic fundamentals like hospitals, schools, universities, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 331, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Companies
...the industry to produce products goods. companies that operate in the countryside will ha...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 383, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun problems is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...at operate in the countryside will have less problems with expansion, because the co...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i feel, in addition, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 1.00243902439 1397% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1424.0 965.302439024 148% => OK
No of words: 262.0 196.424390244 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43511450382 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1125761135 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.488549618321 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 283.868780488 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0486722859 43.030603864 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.454545455 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.27272727273 5.23603664747 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299022716568 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.130104983227 0.103423049105 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844922630807 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180047860737 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0997774016558 0.0819641961636 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.57 11.4140731707 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.