he chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
The given bar chart illustrates the information about the students used five types (car passenger, walking, cycling, walking and bus, bus) of transportation modes for trips of one country in 1990 and 2010.
Overall, the walking was preferred by majority of students for trip in 1990 while most of the students chose car for their travel in 2010.
Regarding the bar chart, the highest number of students walked for their trip which accounted for almost 12.5 millions in comparison with the least preference given to car by only 4.5 million of students in 1990. The other categories cycling, walking with bus and bus was selected by 6.2, 5.9 and 6.5 million of students respectively.
On the other hand, the reverse has been observed in the case of car passenger, they peaked at 10.5 millions in 2010 in contrast to last in 1990. The figures for all the other categories plummeted dramatically up to 6, 2, 3 and 4.5 million of students for walking, cycling, walking with bus and bus respectively.
- Nowadays many countries have very cosmopolitan cities with people from all over the world. How can the government ensure that all these people can live together harmoniously? 95
- The line graph shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents. The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from. 73
- The table shows the data about growth rate of total population in US. 61
- Advances in technology and automation have reduced the need for manual labor. Therefore, working hours should be reduced. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled tea and pineapples in 2010 and 2015 in five European countries. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
regarding, so, while, in contrast, in contrast to, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 832.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.89411764706 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70588235294 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 229.5 283.868780488 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.5509562705 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 138.666666667 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3333333333 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.145567499281 0.215688989381 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0850498315338 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0850765868129 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115872450644 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.082463582471 0.0819641961636 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.