Hoax. Useful or Useless?
Hoax. Useful or Useless?
Freedom of information in this era make everyone have chances to share his opinions, perspectives to influences the people. Many people used this chance for their own interests or for their community. Not all Information or message that assumed as a news in many kind of media have standard of journalism or a news values. Phenomena like this popular that called “hoax”. Now, from this phenomena, the big question was appear in everywhere – hoax is wrong? Or hoax was designed by some people for their interests.
Some people, its mean on this essay is media company, are not said true for hoax. All of media who want to be a good media have to use standard journalism. One of standard journalism that contradict meaning whit hoax is verification to interviewees about the truth of news. Who want to be a good media, to survive in a hard competition whit other media, one thing have to do is never share news that contain element of hoax.
On the other hand, Professor from University of Indonesia, Rocky Gerung said that hoax was designed or created by government. Behind the design of hoax, he assumed there something interests. But now, what kind of interest? Politic? Politic for people welfare? Otherwise, just for politician, so that can take benefit from that hoax?
Other than that, there was hoax designed, it was destination of hoax. Destination of hoax as always used by manager of destination for protect the destination. For example, the Rinjani mountain. Rinjani mountain is one of famous place in Lombok. One of favorite place for climbing lover. Well, for keep a clean in this area, the manager of Rinjani mountain designed the hoax “who throw away the trash everywhere, not in it place, so he will find a big trouble in his live”
In conclusion, we should be a people who have sensitively news about. We should filter a news that have full of values and standard of journalism. Finally, we have to learn understanding about news and hoax.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-07-08 | Gemuh Surya | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 249, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
... Information or message that assumed as a news in many kind of media have standard of ...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 259, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'many kinds'.
Suggestion: many kinds
...on or message that assumed as a news in many kind of media have standard of journalism or...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 309, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...of media have standard of journalism or a news values. Phenomena like this popular tha...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...that called 'hoax'. Now, from this phenomena, the big question was appear ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 429, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'appeared'.
Suggestion: appeared
...om this phenomena, the big question was appear in everywhere – hoax is wrong? Or hoax ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 88, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'news'.
Suggestion: news
...ensitively news about. We should filter a news that have full of values and standard o...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 174, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to understand'.
Suggestion: to understand
...f journalism. Finally, we have to learn understanding about news and hoax.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, kind of, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 28.0 5.60731707317 499% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 3.97073170732 277% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1671.0 965.302439024 173% => OK
No of words: 342.0 196.424390244 174% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88596491228 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 3.73543355544 115% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77982842128 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 106.607317073 161% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.502923976608 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 524.7 283.868780488 185% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 8.94146341463 268% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 50.709531621 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.625 112.824112599 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.25 22.9334400587 62% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.41666666667 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 3.70975609756 323% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.291290414956 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.09821640698 0.103423049105 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141562318002 0.0843802449381 168% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.272495541753 0.15604864568 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.327654456197 0.0819641961636 400% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 13.2329268293 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.49 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.93 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 40.7170731707 192% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.