https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/elit-realia/588f671e-952a-4d42-8876-… table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The given board illustrated the millions of hectares of earth's surface which is wooded in different area of the world from 1990 to 2005. It is clear that the acreage of forest land is slightly decrease in almost area. Out of six areas, the millions of hectares wooded land in Euroupe rose noticeably by years and reached the lagest land number was 1001 ha in 2005. Besides, Asia's tree-laden area slightly fell to 570 in 2000, and then grew by 14 ha in 2005. By contrast, the millions of hectares of forested land in Africa and South America sharply declined, especially South America fell by 42 ha in 2000. Slightlier decreasing than Africa and South America, Oceania and North Ameria marginally decreased from 1990 to 2000, and then millions of hectares in North America stayed still in 705 ha, while that of Oceania countinued to slightly fall to 197 in 2005. By comparing, during the period of ten years, we can see that the millions of hectares of forest area in Europe, which is the highest areage, slightly declined, while that of South Ameria, which is the lowest areage, dramatically decreased. In conclusion, the areage of wooded land on the world decreased in ten years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-02-12 | lehang.live | 56 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1051, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ly declined, while that of South Ameria, which is the lowest areage, dramatically...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, still, then, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 978.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.77073170732 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50393622306 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.547539520022 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.0522247857 43.030603864 149% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.25 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120255626018 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636359794362 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0323410548204 0.0843802449381 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120255626018 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.