The bar charts depict information about what UK graduates and postgraduates did after graduating without taking into account full-time work in 2008.
Overall, both types of students attended for further study and were not interested in voluntary work. In every criterion, the figures for graduate students were markedly higher than postgraduates'.
Further study was chosen the most by students after leaving college. There were 29,665 graduates who continued their education, compared to only 2,725 postgraduates. Following that was part-time work, which was chosen by 17,735 graduate students and 2,535 postgraduate students. Graduating students tended to study further than work part-time, while these criteria seemed to be the same in the data for post-graduating students.
Students who were unemployed had lower figures but markedly high. Unemployment among graduates was 16,235, ten times higher than postgraduates'. Volunteers had the lowest data compared to other work categories, excluding full-time work, in 2008. This figure for graduates was 3,500; however, it was just 345 for postgraduates.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy and projections for 2050
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries Summarise the information 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 33.7804878049 53% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 951.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.87037037037 4.92477711251 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98378103177 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623456790123 0.547539520022 114% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 22.4926829268 62% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0872480748 43.030603864 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4545454545 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.7272727273 22.9334400587 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.72727272727 5.23603664747 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.24571456027 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102732923922 0.103423049105 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0955960949018 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182715757567 0.15604864568 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.122819385671 0.0819641961636 150% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 61.2550243902 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.17 11.4140731707 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.9970731707 69% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.