The tables illustrate the sales revenue of the Fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in five European nations, in 1999 and 2004.
Look more closely at the first table, the sales of fairtrade coffees for all countries were increased in various degree between 1999 and 2004. There was a considerable increase in UK, from 1.5-20 million euros. By contrast, the sales in Denmark and Sweden only increased by 0.2 million euros, and the growth was slightly larger in Belgium, from 1-1.17 million euros. Finally, the revenue of Switzerland doubled from 3-6 million euros.
For the second table, Switzerland had the greatest sales of fairtrade bananas among the European countries, with the dramatic increment between two years, from 15-47 million euros. Meanwhile, the sales in UK and Belgium grew slightly from 1-5.5 million euros and from 0.6-4 million euros respectively. Sweden and Denmark, however, showed a different trend, the sales fell from 1.8-1 million euros and 2-0.9 million euros.
Overall, it is apparent that sales of fairteade coffee rose in all five countries from 1999 to 2004, but the sales of fairtrade bananas only increased in three out of five countries.
- The chart below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 90
- The chart below shows information about changes in average house prices in five different cities between 1990 and 2002 compared with the average house prices in 1989. 67
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The graph below compares changes in the both rates of China and the US between 1920 and 2000. 73
- the table below gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, look, second, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 995.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29255319149 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6134457065 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521276595745 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6160585971 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.555555556 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.265955750038 0.215688989381 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.144329780498 0.103423049105 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.175853880552 0.0843802449381 208% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.267595401388 0.15604864568 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.185077675551 0.0819641961636 226% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.