IELTS Task 1 - Tables give information about sales of fairtrade-labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries

The two tables illustrates the sales of coffee and bananas with Fairtrade labels in 1999 and 2000 which took place in the UK, Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden. Units are in Euros.

Overall, the rate of selling coffee and bananas significantly increased in almost all the countries with Switzerland having the highest sale of bananas while the UK abounded more in coffee business than other. However, Denmark and Sweden banana transactions declined from 1999 to 2004.

In terms of coffee, the British bought more than others over the next five years as the rate rose dramatically from 1.5 millions of euros to 20 millions of euros. This is followed by Switzerland whose sales grew considerably from 3 million to 6 million. Sweden sales increase was the lowest from 0.8 million to 1 million.

Banana business on the other hand, experienced a tremendous sale in Switzerland with a triple fold increase (15 to 47 million) markedly outnumbering other countries. Furthermore, Sweden and Denmark saw a decline in their sales (1.8 million to 1 million and 2 million to 0.9 million respectively).

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '5 million'.
Suggestion: 5 million
...rs as the rate rose dramatically from 1.5 millions of euros to 20 millions of euros. This is ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '20 million'.
Suggestion: 20 million
...matically from 1.5 millions of euros to 20 millions of euros. This is followed by Switzerland ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 240, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... a decline in their sales 1.8 million to 1 million and 2 million to 0.9 million r...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 921.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11666666667 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84853763652 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594444444444 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 269.1 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.5025495946 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.333333333 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.55555555556 5.23603664747 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183914358026 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0844762055166 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802037902021 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139914000495 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902887360808 0.0819641961636 110% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.