The given tables give data about sale of fair trade labelled coffee and banana in five European countries in 1999 and 2004. The whole sale is in millions of euros.
Talking about the sale of coffee, UK had highest sale of 20 million euros in 2004 which amounted to 1.5 million euros in 1999. Switzerland, Denmark, Belgium and Sweden had a sale of 3, 1.8, 1 and 0.8 million euros in 1999 which in 2004 had an increase to 6, 2, 1.7 and 1 million euros respectively.
Moving on to the sale of bananas, UK again had the highest sale of bananas from 15 million euros in 1999 to 47 million euros in 2004. Further Switzerland and Denmark had a sale of 1 and 0.6 million euros in 1999 which climbed up for both the countries to 4 and 1 million euros respectively in 2004.
Belgium and Sweden had a decrease in sale of bananas from 1.8 and 2 million euros in 1999 to 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004.
Thus on an average it could be concluded that sales for both coffee and bananas had an increase in 2004 as compared to the sale in 1999 which could probably be due to increasing population or some other factors.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
... Talking about the sale of coffee, UK had highest sale of 20 million euros in 2004 which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...crease in sale of bananas from 1.8 and 2 million euros in 1999 to 1 and 0.9 milli...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... to 1 and 0.9 million euros in 2004. Thus on an average it could be concluded tha...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, thus, talking about
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 917.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.34597156398 4.92477711251 88% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42772482936 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.440758293839 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.8472504435 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 112.824112599 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.375 22.9334400587 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282615175142 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182434064533 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.161549638713 0.0843802449381 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.222262896013 0.15604864568 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.160454306408 0.0819641961636 196% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 78.93 61.2550243902 129% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.25 11.4140731707 72% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.