The table illustrates information about the total income and food and clothes expenditure. Meanwhile, the pie charts show the differences in the distribution of money spent on various categories in 2010 and 2013, measured in percentage.
In general, 2013 witnessed a decrease in total income compared to that of in 2010. Additionally, the budget for fruits and vegetables rose significantly, while the opposite trend was true for clothes throughout the observed period.
More specifically, the total household income experienced a drop of 4,000 pounds, from 29,000 pounds in 2010 to 25,000 pounds in 2013. Despite the decrease in total income, money spent on clothes and food steadily increased from 14,000 pounds to 15,000 pounds within three years.
Despite making up just only 15% in 2010, the expenditure of diary products saw a slight rise to one-fifth in 2013. Meanwhile, the figure for fruits and vegetables increased substantially to over a third in 2013. Additionally, the proportion of money spent on other food and beverages in 2013 remained a similar level to that of in 2010.
In terms of budget on clothes, there was a notable drop in the figure for clothes, from 22% to 12%. Spending on meat and fish accounted for the highest figure among other categories in 2010, with a rate of a quarter, falling sharply to 15% in 2013.
- Nowadays some people claim that public museums and art galleries will not be needed because people can see historical objects and works by using the computer Do you agree or disagree 84
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 78
- In some countries young people are living in richer and healthier condition but less happy What are the reasons What might be done to solve this issue 90
- Some people think planning future is a waste of time and people should focus on the present To what extent do you agree or disagree 69
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09459459459 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86557657316 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.509009009009 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 323.1 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0766681751 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.818181818 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21611615133 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0902448328853 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650686802347 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122068717861 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507722633661 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.06136585366 100% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.