The line graph indicates the difference of internet users proportion in three particular countries between 1999 and 2009.
Overall, the percentage of internet users in both countries increased substaintially over the period of 10 years. However, the ratio of Mexican users was much lower in comparison with that in the USA, and Canada experienced the fastest development in internet access.
In 1999, the proportion of internet users in America was approximately 20 percent while this percentage in Canada and Mexico were quite smaller at about 10 percent and 5 percent. Six years later, percentage of Canadians and Americans using internet dramatically climb over 75 percent, whereas the figure for Mexico rose just in vicinity of 25 percent.
Ultimately, in 2009, the ratio of internet accessers in Canada reached a peak of 100 percent, follow up was America with around 80 percent and only 40 percent in Mexico.
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthly household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 41
- TOPIC: Global warming is one of the biggest threats humans face in the 21st century and sea levels are continuing to rise at alarming rates. What problems are associated with this and what are some possible solutions? 56
- The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year 89
- Early technological developments brought more benefits and changes to people’s life than the recent technological developments. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 89
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 779.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 147.0 196.424390244 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29931972789 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.48200454523 3.73543355544 93% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85461501392 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 87.0 106.607317073 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 25.3048085022 43.030603864 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 129.833333333 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280290467701 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162151296247 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733420236609 0.0843802449381 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180168292276 0.15604864568 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898028499117 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.