In June 1996, an experimental flu vaccine was trialled in a large country town on females only.
The diagrams outline the outcomes of flu vaccine trial among females in a big town in June 1996. Overall, the experimental flu vaccine was not effective in terms of its results on female.
In the bar chart, it is interesting to note that from March to May, the flu was responsible for the deaths of 1 female while 4 females deaths compared to 1 male death during the next period of June to August. The pie chart shows that only 72% females most at risk was given flu vaccine whereas the remaining 28% did not take part in. Females over 65 years old, babies, children and who were hospitalized made up for 35%, 24%, 13% respectively.
According to the line graph, females starting from the same point as males to reach a peak of 3500 in June while the latter was 2600 cases. The figure declined considerably to just under 2500, at the similar pattern with males throughout the epidemic.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-31 | AnneDao | 84 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Aarohi Agarwal | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Aarohi Agarwal | 78 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Aarohi Agarwal | 73 | view |
| 2018-11-15 | Aarohi Agarwal | 73 | view |
- Companies spend millions each year on advertising online in magazines or billboards These adverts can encourage people to buy goods that they do not really need What are the positive and negative of consumerism 89
- The chart below shows estimated world illiteracy rates by region and by gender for the year 2000 67
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 78
- Some organizations believe that their employees should dress smartly. Others value quality of work above appearance. 56
- Some organisations believe that their employees should dress smartly Others value quality of work above appearance Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 119, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s responsible for the deaths of 1 female while 4 females deaths compared to 1 mal...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
may, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 736.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.6 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44936216187 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.675 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 220.5 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3587134333 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.142857143 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.71428571429 5.23603664747 52% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30786439688 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.137981073642 0.103423049105 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099383803386 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215344049201 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127031619366 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.79 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.