Line chart shows the average attendance at the cinema among various age groups in US from 2000 to 2011
The provided line chart illustrate the number of average percentage of cinema among different age brackets in US between 2000 to 2011.
After analyzing, it can be clearly seen that people who are 35 and above, almost 2% went cinema in 2000 to 2002. Further, it increased consistently in 2004. From 2006 to 2008, it rose approximately 8%, after it declined by 2%. In 2010 and 2011, it reached at almost 12%. Between 2000 to 2006, people who belong to 25 to 35 age groups, attended cinema almost 22%. After, it declined approximately 3%. In 2008, it rose sharply and declined again at almost 23% . In 2010, it rose again at 30%.
By contrast, specially teenagers's cinema attendance was 10% in 2000 and declined in 2002. From 2004 to 2008, it increased significantly but in the middle of 2008, it again drop out and again rose approximately 38%. However, it decreased at 30%. From 2000 to 2006, the percentage of just above of teenagers, who went to cinema was almost 44%. After, it is decreased by 7% and after, it showed some fluctuation between 2008 to 2010. In 2011, it again declined by 4%.
Looking from an overall perspective, it is evident that the percentage of age groups of 35 to above increased in whole given time whereas specially teenagers percentage dropout.
- The tables below show the consumption and production of potatoes in different regions of the world in 2006 77
- The graph below shows the number of University graduates in Canada from 1992 to 2007 do you think it is better for student to work before their University study Why use reasons and specific examples to support your choice 67
- The diagram shows rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian town
- some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn about current events however other believe that they can learn use better through other media discuss the both views and give your opinion 56
- even though globalisation affect the words economics in a very positive way it s a negative side should not be forgotten discuss the both views and give your opinion 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ing, it can be clearly seen that people who are 35 and above, almost 2% went cinema in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...age groups, attended cinema almost 22%. After, it declined approximately 3%. In 2008,...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sharply and declined again at almost 23% . In 2010, it rose again at 30%. By cont...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...tly but in the middle of 2008, it again drop out and again rose approximately 38%. H...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73873873874 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72313640082 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 1.53170731707 914% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0620356587 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.75 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.875 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310391862503 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945475370433 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935625593956 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209598554401 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121390614124 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 53, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ing, it can be clearly seen that people who are 35 and above, almost 2% went cinema in ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 363, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...age groups, attended cinema almost 22%. After, it declined approximately 3%. In 2008,...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 457, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...sharply and declined again at almost 23% . In 2010, it rose again at 30%. By cont...
^^
Line 3, column 172, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'drops'?
Suggestion: drops
...tly but in the middle of 2008, it again drop out and again rose approximately 38%. H...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, so, whereas
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 5.60731707317 321% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 33.7804878049 154% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1052.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73873873874 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72313640082 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.490990990991 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 303.3 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 1.53170731707 914% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 3.36585365854 327% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 8.94146341463 179% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 22.4926829268 58% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.0620356587 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.75 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.875 22.9334400587 61% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.1875 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310391862503 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0945475370433 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0935625593956 0.0843802449381 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209598554401 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121390614124 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.2 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.0 10.3012195122 58% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.62 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.98 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.9970731707 65% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.