The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013

Essay topics:

The line graph below gives information about the number of visitors to three London museums between June and September 2013.

The change in how many people visiting to three different museums in London throughout summer from June to September 2013 is displayed in the line graph, shown in number.
Overall, British Museum was the most well-known among three other places. However, the only one figure witnessing a downward trend was observed on Natural History Museum.
Initially, there had been 600 thousand visitors coming to British Museum, being the highest number. When it came to two other public attractions, the tourist of Science Museum had accounted for around 400 thousand, being lower than that of Natural History Museum with a gap of approximately 150 thousand.
Eventually, although the number of British Museum visitors peaked at 700 thousand in July, it decreased in the end in about 650 thousand, but this remained the largest. Turning to Science Museum, the figure for attendees increased by 50 thousand. This contrasted to the rest, the level of people attending there declined to share mostly number as similar as the second aforementioned public attractions.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, well

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31547619048 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72100645604 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660714285714 0.547539520022 121% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0383819343 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.625 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257855754706 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108362018978 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0999386228851 0.0843802449381 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.163798996571 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111479442914 0.0819641961636 136% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.