The line graph below provide the information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010

A glance at the provided line graph illustrates the information about the earnings (in thousands Dollars) of four eateries in a city in 2010. In general, it is clearly apparent that most of the restaurants showed an upward revenue pattern in the end of the year except Spicy Fortune.

Looking in more detail from the chart, in January, Spicy Fortune earned the highest among others at 160,000 Dollars while the remain three only got 30,000 to 100,000 Dollars. In the next seven months, the income of Evening Paradise restaurants climbed gradually reaching 100,000 Dollars while Delicacy and Spicy Fortune showed fluctuation income by around 20,000 to 40,000 Dollars. On the other hand, Grand Fiesta reported to have slightly decrease earning by 20,000 Dollars. However, although it experienced fall up to 60,000 Dollars in September, the earning of Evening Paradise jumped dramatically three folds at 190,000 Dolars in the end of the year. Similarly, there was also a considerable raise of money earned by Delicacy eatery by two folds from 60,000 to 120,000 Dollars in December. Additionally, the income of Grand Fiesta also reported rose slightly at 140,000 Dollars. Finally, Spicy fortune showed the opposite trend in income which dropped significantly by 90,000 Dollars.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 123, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...t among others at 160,000 Dollars while the remain three only got 30,000 to 100,000 Dollar...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 990, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ropped significantly by 90,000 Dollars.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, in general, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28078817734 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63470823725 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581280788177 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.1510966139 43.030603864 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.111111111 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5555555556 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.44444444444 5.23603664747 180% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135817732758 0.215688989381 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0750607115908 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.138604187768 0.0843802449381 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196389046539 0.15604864568 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155599323749 0.0819641961636 190% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.