The line graph below shows the amount of waste from three companies in 15 years.
Summarize the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the difference in terms of waste output between three companies from 2000 to 2015.
Overall, while the waste produced by companies A and B dropped considerably throughout the years, company C witnessed a gradual increase in waste output over 15 years.
In 2000, the waste produced by company C was about 4 tons. After that, the figure experienced significant growth to about 6 tons in 2005. The waste output of company C continued to rise slightly to about 7 tons in 2010 before skyrocketed to 10 tons in the next 5 years.
In contrast, two other companies – A and B followed the same downward trend over the years. In 2005, company A produced 12 tons of waste, while company B produced 8 tons. In the next 5 years, the amount of waste produced by company A dropped slightly to about 11 tons while that of B increased moderately to 10 tons. In the final 10 years of the period, the waste company A outputted saw a gradual decrease to 8 ton 2015. Similarly, the figure for company B witnessed a dramatic drop to just below 4 tons in 2015.
- The line graph below gives information about the rates of unemployment between 1991 and 2005 in three different countries in Europe. The table shows the percentage of men and women in the workforce in these three countries. 78
- Playing computer game is a waste of time for children. Do you agree? 70
- Playing computer game is a waste of time for children. Do you agree? 73
- The line graph below shows the amount of waste from three companies in 15 years.Summarize the infomation by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The graph illustrates the difference in ...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...three companies from 2000 to 2015. Overall, while the waste produced by com...
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ase in waste output over 15 years. In 2000, the waste produced by company C...
^^
Line 13, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed to 10 tons in the next 5 years. In contrast, two other companies – A and...
^^
Line 13, column 174, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...waste, while company B produced 8 tons. In the next 5 years, the amount of waste p...
^^
Line 13, column 320, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...t of B increased moderately to 10 tons. In the final 10 years of the period, the w...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, similarly, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62694300518 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68001393603 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.461139896373 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 255.6 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8259328221 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.3 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3 5.23603664747 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 1.13902439024 702% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199602712578 0.215688989381 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0967351423138 0.103423049105 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.055993999676 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153598447357 0.15604864568 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0430832850305 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 13.2329268293 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.87 8.06136585366 85% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.