The line graph demonstrates the switching of three particular junk foods which were consumed by the Australian teenagers the year between 1975 to 2000.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that pizzas and hamburgers tend to grow from the beginning of the graph. Though in the case of fish and chips fluctuation is observed up to 1985 then it gradually climbed down.
Regarding the pizzas and hamburgers both highlight the same trend, while pizzas increased from nearly zero to 85 approximately like linearly up to 1985. After that time it rose slowly but after 1995 it remained to level off. On the other hand, hamburgers climbed up exponentially but just after 1995, it stood at the same value which was close to 83.
Turning to the last feature, although it started with the topmost among the features and the amount was 100 then it began to decrease up to 1985, after 1995 it slipped down linearly and end with below 40.
- Some peopel think that one world government is better than national governments Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- University students must pay all tuition fees because it benefits mostly them individually rather than the society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The bar charts below show the number of hours each teacher spent teaching in different schools in four different countries in 2001 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 352, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t the same value which was close to 83. Turning to the last feature, although it...
^^^^^
Line 6, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...mong the features and the amount was 100 then it began to decrease up to 1985, af...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, regarding, then, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.75460122699 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47026808198 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631901840491 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 216.9 283.868780488 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6221953878 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.714285714 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2857142857 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.57142857143 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.140124005274 0.215688989381 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631632217607 0.103423049105 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083730576112 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100219900505 0.15604864568 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869209294914 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.2329268293 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.51 61.2550243902 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.