The following graph represents the data of Australian teenagers and
their preferred fast food item from 1975 to 2020. The data is represented here in the form of
line chart.
Fish and chips was the most famous and consumed item in 1975 among the teenagers, but as the time went by
it declined. Hamburgers although the least famous in the beginning now is the most famous item.
The line chart shows a steady decline in fish and chips, however, during the interval of 1980-1985 it shows
an increase in consumption and after that there is a steady decrease all the way till 2000. Hamburgers on the
other hand started with a very low consumption at the beginning of the survey but since then it has shown a very
steady increase and now sits at the top of fast food consumption chart.
Pizza started at the bottom of the chart but over time it overtook fish and chips and now is second most
consumed fast food item among teenagers in Australia.
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- In some parts of the world people try to find one s own family history why do people do this does this have positive or negative impact 61
- In some parts of the world people try to find one s own family history why do people do this does this have positive or negative impact 61
- France India 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nts the data of Australian teenagers and their preferred fast food item from 1975...
^^^
Line 8, column 108, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...uring the interval of 1980-1985 it shows an increase in consumption and after tha...
^^^
Line 9, column 110, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...all the way till 2000. Hamburgers on the other hand started with a very low consu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, second, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 796.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 170.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.68235294118 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42104384248 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517647058824 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 226.8 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.6331159819 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.714285714 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.71428571429 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 3.83414634146 261% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162962269744 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800861338756 0.103423049105 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700989095874 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0719053575184 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0636237757459 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 72.5 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.24 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.