The line graph below shows changes in the amount of fast food eaten by teenagers from Australia for 1975 to 2000

The given line graph depicts the changes in the consumption of fast food by Australian teenagers between 1975 and 2000 .
Overall, it can be clearly seen that hamburgers were quite famous among teenagers from 1975 to 1990 and the consumption was on its leap till 1987 after that it was stabilized in the later years. Pizza consumption increased gradually in the starting and got levelled out from 1997 . Fishes and chips had very rapid changes and they just declined from 1975 to 2000.
Now turning to the details, the spent of fishes and chips was at its surge in 1975 but then it decreased gradually from 100% to 40% by rapid fluctuations. Pizza consumption increased enormously but gradually from 1975 to 1997 from 1 % to 81% with some fractional fluctuations in between. Later it remained steady between 1997 and 2000 at 82%.
Lastly, hamburgers were on a rapid increase till 1987 from 2 % to 83% then there was a gradual increase in its consumption till 1997 later it remained constant at 100%

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 119, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...stralian teenagers between 1975 and 2000 . Overall, it can be clearly seen that ...
^^
Line 2, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nagers between 1975 and 2000 . Overall, it can be clearly seen that hamburgers w...
^^
Line 2, column 280, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... starting and got levelled out from 1997 . Fishes and chips had very rapid changes...
^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...997 from 1 % to 81% with some fractional fluctuations in between. Later it remain...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, lastly, so, then

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 826.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 172.0 196.424390244 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8023255814 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65598108751 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.540697674419 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 218.7 283.868780488 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8323265067 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.25 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.625 5.23603664747 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217658027199 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119009476003 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116777702687 0.0843802449381 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176734189659 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140307535156 0.0819641961636 171% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.56 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.89 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.