The line graph below shows the consumption of 4 different types of meat by European country from 1979 to 2004.
The line graph illustrates the consumption of chicken, beef, lamb and fish meat over the period of 25 years from 1979 to 2004 in European nation. Amount of the flesh consumed by a person in each week is measured in grams.
Overall, it has been seen clearly that the consumption of chicken had increased by the end of 2004 while for remaining meats, it got reduced by 2004.
Nearly 150 grams if chicken was eaten by each person per week in 1979 which rose to nearly 250 grams in the year of 2002 before dropping to approximately 245 grams in the final year(2004). On the other hand, amount of lamb eaten by the folks was quiet same as chicken in starting year(exactly 150 grams per person per week) but it decreased to around 60 grams in 2004.
In each week, each person was eating around 210 grams of beef which reached to roughly 230 grams in the year of 1983 and in following years, consumption was decreasing gradually and dropped to approximately 100 grams in 2004. Similarly, decrease was seen in the consumption of lamb from 1979 to 2004(150 grams to about 50 grams per person per week respectively).
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-07 | akashdhingra | view |
- Some people think that all the university students should study whatever they like. others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.Discuss both the views 61
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development, but some important social values are lost as a result. Do you think that the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages. 73
- As computers translate quickly and accurately, learning a foreign language is a waste of time.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- Planting trees is very important for the environment. Some people says trees should be planted in the vacant areas of cities and towns, while other says housing facilities should be build instead. Do you agree or disagree? 73
- the table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 911.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57788944724 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50796564358 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517587939698 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 242.1 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.6166042152 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.142857143 112.824112599 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4285714286 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155313994478 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952361407046 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113760793799 0.0843802449381 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127682524051 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0959099899992 0.0819641961636 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 61.2550243902 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.