The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates the difference between the oil usage and manufacturing in millions of barrels per day in China from 1982 to 2006.

Overall, in the beginning the production of gasoline was little higher than consumption and at the end of the period the used of fuel was much higher than manufacture.

In Regards, the production of oil was 2.1 millions barrels per day in 1982 and sudden it was rapidly increased and reached 3 millions barrels. While, the making of oil was steady from 1986 to 1994. However, it was slowly increased and reached 3.5 million barrels per day in 2006.

Secondly, the usage of petrol was below 2 millions barrels per day in 1982 and it was still stabled till 1990. After 8 years of periods the usage of oil was reached 4 million in 1998 while in 2006 the consumption of oils was more than 6 millions barrels per day. Hence it proved that the usage was much higher than production.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic
Essays by the user:
>>> more essays by the user >>>

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 53, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...the beginning the production of oil was little bit higher than consumption and at the end ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 149, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ncreased and reached 3 million barrels. While, the making of oil was steady till 1994...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...1982 and it was still stable till 1990. After 8 years of periods the usage of oil was...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...as more than 6 million barrels per day. Hence it proved that the usage was much highe...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, second, secondly, still, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 756.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 166.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55421686747 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58944267634 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49499426272 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 75.0 106.607317073 70% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.451807228916 0.547539520022 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 211.5 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6082924427 43.030603864 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.5 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.75 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154039724253 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0899512007469 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0645641696975 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128031213323 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640009976975 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.11 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.01 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.