A glance at the supplied line graph indicates the percentage of the oil production and consumption in China over a 24 consecutive year period starting from 1982.
Overall, as can be apparently seen that there was an upward trend for both of the proportion of oil production and consumption had reach a peak of at the end of the period, while the rate of oil production rose slightly throughout the period.
In 1982, it's obvious that the percentage of oil consumption and production had a similarity, roughly 2 million of oil barrels per day. Aftertwo years, the figure of the production witnessed an uplit rapidly to 3 million and then remained stabilize until 1994 while the rate of the consumption had remained stable for four years before increasing significantly to 3.5 million in 1994.
Moving on, the proportion of oil consumption climbed slightly to 0.5 million in 1998 and finally had reached its highest level in the second half of the period, with production increased steadily to 3.5 million of oil barrels throughout the period indicated.
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 percentage 67
- The chart below gives information about car ownership in the UK from 1975 to 2005 percentage 61
- The line graph below shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
A glance at the supplied line graph indi...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cutive year period starting from 1982. Overall, as can be apparently seen that ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n rose slightly throughout the period. In 1982, its obvious that the percentage...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... significantly to 3.5 million in 1994. Moving on, the proportion of oil consump...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, finally, if, second, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 878.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98863636364 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88967240558 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.545454545455 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 35.0 22.4926829268 156% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.8708167813 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 175.6 112.824112599 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 35.2 22.9334400587 153% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179729221195 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119518562443 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609197828872 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.127620858861 0.15604864568 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0512527769714 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.7 13.2329268293 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.41 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.3012195122 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 11.4140731707 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.42 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 16.0 10.9970731707 145% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.