The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton.
Summary the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The line graph compares the proportion of visitors to England who went to four different attractions in Brighton from 1980 to 2010.
At glance at the graph provided reveals that the percentage of tourists who visited the Pier and the Pavilion increased over the the given period while the figure for the other attractions showed the reverse.
Increasing from approximately 22% in 1980 to 38% in 1985, the proportion of travellers going to the Art Gallery then plunged to a low of just 8% in 2010, which was the lowest point of the whole graph. In 1980, 30% of tourists to England went to the Festival. Then it fell to around 24% in 1995 before rising steadily to about 28% at the end of the period.
Over the same period, the rate of visitors who visited the Pavilion varied significantly. It climbed sharply from almost 24% in 1980 to 48% in 1995, which was the highest point of the whole line graph, followed by a rapid decline to 30% in 2010. The Pier accounted for the lowest number of tourists with only 10% in 1980. It increased to 15% in 1985, but this then dropped gradually to less than 10% in 1990. This was followed by a period of exponential growth, with the figure for tourists reaching a peak of somewhere in the vicinity of 22% in 2010.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...he Pier and the Pavilion increased over the the given period while the figure for the o...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 126, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...he Pier and the Pavilion increased over the the given period while the figure for the o...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1027.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 228.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.50438596491 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49111610201 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495614035088 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5064642244 43.030603864 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.7 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.4 5.23603664747 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179081129296 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0758498651235 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805078275241 0.0843802449381 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146061115828 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842967802686 0.0819641961636 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.