The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The provided chart presents the proportion of visitors coming to England, especially traveling to tourists attracted destinations in Brighton (…) throughout three decades.
It is clear that all sites had fluctuated tendency. The most dramatic changes were seen in the overtaking between Art to Festival, Pavilion in the first of period and to Pier in the third decade shown.
Initially, from 1980 to 1985, Art Gallery witnessed a significant surge with roughly two-fifths and overtook others except Pier, which was the lowest ratio. Nevertheless, after being exceeded by Pier in the year 2005, Art Gallery saw a considerate plunge with a completely stayed figure, just below 10%.
On the other hand, Pavilion and Festival had a similar characteristic with the surpassing of Pavilion in 1985. Mainly, in the second decade, Pavilion leaped substantially and reached a peak at approximately a half. At the end of the graph, the percentage of Pavilion peaked the highest point, almost a third.

Votes
Average: 1.1 (1 vote)

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, third, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 837.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 158.0 196.424390244 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29746835443 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.54539209256 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94396337704 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.689873417722 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4964581661 43.030603864 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.625 112.824112599 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0636619471486 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0268266714863 0.103423049105 26% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417301982627 0.0843802449381 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0412199149211 0.15604864568 26% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0456617084586 0.0819641961636 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.46 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.68 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.

Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.