A glance at the provided line graph illustrates the information about the figures of England's visitors who came to Brighton attractions from 1980 to 2010. In general, it is clearly apparent that the percentage of those who visited Pavilion and Pier showed an upward pattern during the period while those who attended art gallery showed the opposite.
Looking in more detail from the chart, in 1980, the visitors of Pier reported to be the lowest among other attractions at 10%. However, it climbed gradually and reached around 20% in the next three decades. The increase also showed in the proportion of Pavilion tourists which recorded at approximately 24% in the beginning and 30% in the end of the period respectively. However, interestingly, it culminated a peak in 1995 at below 50% before it dropped gradually. On the other hand, the proportion of Art gallery visitors, although it had reached the highest point in 1985 at 37%, it then reported dropping considerably to below 10% in 2010. Finally, the figures of festival visitors remained unchanged during the period around 28-30%.
- the graph below gives information about US government spending on research between 1980 and 2008 73
- Nowadays more people would rather purchase food than cook at home What are the advantages and disadvantages of this trend 56
- Students today can easily access information online so libraries are no longer necessary Do you agree or disagree 73
- Young people spend much of their free time on shopping malls It has negativeeffects in both young people and the society that they live in To what extent do youagree or disagree 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, look, so, then, while, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11173184358 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80353430964 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586592178771 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3918308572 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 22.9334400587 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.205485231751 0.215688989381 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781024827356 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658617728291 0.0843802449381 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171619420422 0.15604864568 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638640039884 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.