The provided line graph illustrates the data about the expenditures of the US government on five different research topics from 1980 to 2008. In general, it is clearly apparent that the highest research budget was in health sector.
Looking in more detail from the chart, at the beginning, The US government spent 2.5 to 7.5 billions dollars on their five topics of research that the highest for health studies and the least for general science studies. In the next 4 years, the spending on the research except general science and energy sectors showed a slight decrease by 1 to 2 billions dollars. However, after that, there was a dramatic increase on money spent for health experiments reached a peak at approximately 22.5 billions dollars in 2004 and ended at 17.5 billions dollars in 2008. Additionally, although it was not significant, the spending on space and general science investigations also climbed by around 2,5 to 4 billions dollars, respectively. On the other hand, the budget for other topics of research showed a decline by 2.5 billions dollars at the end of the periods although it had positive curve patterns. Finally, the budget for energy studies fluctuated at the range of 5 to 7.5 billion dollars.
- The diagrams below show the life cycle of a species of large fish called the salmon Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people say that e books and modern technology will totally replace traditional newspaper and magzines to what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Coal consumption by sectors in the UK in million tonnes 78
- Some people think that cities are the best places to live Others prefer to live in a rural area Compare the advantages and disadvantages of living in the city to living in the countryside Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from 73
- The chart shows the depth of snow cm in a particular resort in Canada in three individual years 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, look, so, in general, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1020.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78469342896 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524509803922 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 292.5 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.8398179268 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.5 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.375 5.23603664747 160% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163932511066 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837403891797 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101731596178 0.0843802449381 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189647408512 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10533756203 0.0819641961636 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.