The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four differnt attractions in Brighton.
A glance at the graph provided reveals the proportion of visitors to England among four various tourist attractions in Brighton during the three decades from 1980 to 2010.
It is apparent from the information supplied that a number of people who came to Pavilion saw a dramatic growth while the remainders experienced a downward trend.
From a negligible 10 percent among tourists to Pier in 1980, then fluctuated at somewhere between 9 and 15 percent prior to 2005, before soaring at 22% in 2010. Opposite the trend, the most popular destination among four categories was the Festival with the figure approximately in 1980. The subsequent decades, however, saw a slight around 28% in 2010.
In 1980, the figures for Pavillon and Art at 22 and 24 percent respectively. However, the Pavilion reached a peak of nearly 50% by the year 1995, but this then plunged to 31% in 2010. Likewise, the Art showed the same pattern of the trend with the Festival, rising to 38 percent in 1985, before sliding away to less than 10% at the end of the period, despite slight fluctuations.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-20 | Phạm Phú Trường | 78 | view |
- The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development? 84
- It is neither possible nor useful to provide university places for a high proportion of young people 78
- In the modern world it is possible to shop work and communicate with people via the internet and live without any face to face contact with others Is it a positive or negative development in your opinion 78
- Topic: as well as making money, business also have social responsibilities. Do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, likewise, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 897.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72103559979 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630434782609 0.547539520022 115% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.0282224829 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.125 112.824112599 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.875 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11317609881 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0455411828064 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722774114591 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0818461284201 0.15604864568 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0871731608697 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.2329268293 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.