The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The line graph illustrates how many people traveled to Scotland and went to see four different places over the period of 30 years.

Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the trend of visitors to castle and zoo experienced a gradual progress during the period of 30 years. However, there was a moderate decline in the proportion of travelers to aquarium and festival at the same time. In addition, Castle experienced the highest percentage of the four attraction places between 1980 and 2010.
At the beginning of the period, Festival was the most favorite place which attracted 30% of tourists visiting. Nevertheless, a steady drop of more than 10% was witnessed in the proportion of visitors in 2010. Similarly, the number of people who visited Aquarium took 20% in 1980, reaching the vertex at about 35% and then substantially reduced to 25% during the last year.
In contrast, before touching the highest point at more than two-fifths in 1995, the number of tourists who visited Castle experienced a sudden drop of nearly 15% for over the period of 15 years. In 1980, Zoo was the place that saw the lowest number of visitors at, just 10%, but in the next 30 years, the percentage of zoo goers rose twice as much as that in the beginning year.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 101, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'gradual progress'.
Suggestion: gradual progress
... visitors to castle and zoo experienced a gradual progress during the period of 30 years. However,...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...me time. In addition, Castle experienced the highest percentage of the four attra...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, nevertheless, similarly, then, in addition, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1044.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76712328767 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58553151352 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525114155251 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4398298773 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.0 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3333333333 22.9334400587 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117760500906 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527797129301 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460496187951 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0847239226187 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358657858038 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.2329268293 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.