The line graph provided illustrates the proportion of visiting of tourists in four specific attractions in Edinburgh over the course of 30 years starting from 1980.
Overall, it is obvious that the figures for the castle and zoo had an insignificant increase whilst the percent of aquarium and festival witnessed a decline over the whole period. Unexpectedly, all of 4 categories had the same alteration with 10%.
To commencing, By 1980, the festival was the most well-known attraction, and the castle, aquarium, and zoo respectively ranked after. In the next 5-years period, the quite alteration was experienced and there is a surpassing of castle's proportion in 1985 . Furthermore, castle was became the most popular destination in the rest or survey's period which have reached the peak at 45 % in 1995. Beside this, Festival kept declining in the rest of period and ended up with only under 20%.
Additionally, Zoo was witnessed a significant rise by 10% in the percent of tourists visited and became the second highest categories in the end of period. Meanwhile, the proportion of aquarium fluctuated drastically about 15% and had a decrease for the next years until reach a trought of under 10%. Although these 4 categories have the same amount of fluctuations, the domination of the proportion of castles was clearly observed while the aquarium was the destination that have the spare amount of visiters most.
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Muhammad Hassam Saeed
Essay Categories
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 15, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ame alteration with 10%. To commencing, By 1980, the festival was the most well-...
^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...surpassing of castles proportion in 1985 . Furthermore, castle was became the most...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.97073170732 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1189.0 965.302439024 123% => OK
No of words: 231.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14718614719 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98127294265 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.554112554113 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 356.4 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.8001256279 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.9 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 5.23603664747 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638046993974 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0286235599753 0.103423049105 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628520742086 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0620502789946 0.15604864568 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0869260217016 0.0819641961636 106% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.81 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 40.7170731707 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.