The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh, Scotland
The given graph depicts the proportion of visitors who took the vacations in four various destinations, namely Aquarius, Castle, Festival and the Zoo in Edinburgh, Scotland over a 30-year period starting from 1980
Overall, while the percentage of holidaymakers to Castle and Aquarium increased dramatically in 1995 and in 1985 respectively, there was a notable fluctuation in figures for those who visited the Zoo from 1980 to 2000. In addition, the proportion of tourists to Festival stayed constant over time
looking at the specifics, during 1995, it is evident that the number of tourists to Castle and almost reached the peak of 45%, while that of those who visited Aquarium started to dip considerably to less than 10% over time, after there had been an upward trend at roughly 35%. Furthermore, the proportion of holidaymakers to Festival fell marginally from 30% to 25%, despite a noticable variation in that of visitors who spent their vacations in the Zoo.
At the rest of the period, in spite of a steady increase by 10% in the percentage of visitors visiting the Zoo, that of those to Aquarium and Castle dropped steeply to less than 10% and roughly 30% correspondingly. Also of note is that there was a constant steadiness at more than 25% in the number of those who opted to visit Festival
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-22 | beomnie_gyuu | 67 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Looking
...o Festival stayed constant over time looking at the specifics, during 1995, it is ev...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ted to dip considerably to less than 10% over time, after there had been an upwar...
^^
Line 7, column 216, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...an 10% and roughly 30% correspondingly. Also of note is that there was a constant st...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, so, while, in addition, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1093.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 221.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94570135747 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85565412703 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88026022043 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511312217195 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 326.7 283.868780488 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 44.0 22.4926829268 196% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 117.329280233 43.030603864 273% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 218.6 112.824112599 194% => OK
Words per sentence: 44.2 22.9334400587 193% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8 5.23603664747 244% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16804023765 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0885388882168 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0506784663678 0.0843802449381 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111655707468 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326671117363 0.0819641961636 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 13.2329268293 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.28 61.2550243902 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 19.3 10.3012195122 187% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.32 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 27.5 11.4329268293 241% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 19.6 10.9970731707 178% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.0658536585 181% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.