The graph illustrates the paper, wood pulp and sawn-wood produced in the UK between 1980 and 2000.
It is clear from the chart that the production of paper and packaging saw a sharp increase while that of saw-wood and wood pulp was the opposite. Besides, the amount of paper and packaging manufactured was remarkably higher than the other two over the 20 years.
From 1980 to 1990, the line for paper and packaging slightly rose, from 230 to 250 million tonnes. By contrast, that of saw-wood and wood pulp experienced a decrease. In terms of sawn-wood, it was 170 million tonnes in 1980 and 200 in terms of wood pulp. Both reached 150 million tonnes in 1990.
Looking at the graph for more detail, by the last 10 years, while a great deal of wood pulp devised continued to fell to 130, the manufacture of paper and packaging and wood pulp went up. However, the former boomed and peaked at 350 million tonnes, doubled the figure of sawn-wood produced, which stood at 165 million tonnes after a small drop
Votes
Essay reference notes: This topic is refereed from another essay topic, developed by user: Linhjane
Essay Categories
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, however, look, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.62569832402 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39322723404 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.54748603352 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 225.9 283.868780488 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1657729065 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.22222222222 5.23603664747 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.337955216519 0.215688989381 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.162136507509 0.103423049105 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119237243727 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250041238972 0.15604864568 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105018321078 0.0819641961636 128% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.2329268293 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 61.2550243902 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.57 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.49 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.