The line graph depicts the amount spent on books in four European countries over 10 years from 1995 to 2005.
The line graph depicts the amount spent on books in four European countries over 10 years from 1995 to 2005.
Overall, all the countries followed a similar upward trend. Germany people spent most of their money on reading books and the figures for Austria went up significantly compared to other countries.
The amount of money spent on books by Germany gradually increased to 90 million in 1999 before slightly decreasing to around 85 million in 2003, finally, the amount raised just over 95 million at the end of the recorded period. While Austria spent the least money in 1995, the numbers then slightly raised to around 40 million and stayed relatively stable until 2001, followed by a dramatic growth to marginally above 70 million in 2005.
The money spent on books by France had a steady rise from just under 60 million to about 69 million in 2001 and finally climbed close to 75 million in 2005. The figures for Italy hovered from around 50 million to about 60 million until 2003, followed by a rise to just above 60 million in 2005.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-03-22 | SaranyaJeevesh | 73 | view |
- The chart gives information about marriage and children in a selection of countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 82
- People should choose their course of study not on the basis of their own interests, but based on the kinds of jobs they can get.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- ake a look at the graphic and complete the task The table and chart show data from a survey of library users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The table illustrates the data about the forest area in millions of hectares in six different continents of the globe in 1990, 2000 and 2005. 73
- The increase in the number of obese person is costing so much money to the health care system. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74316939891 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30700778702 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 95.0 106.607317073 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.51912568306 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1973606833 43.030603864 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 112.824112599 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 22.9334400587 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 5.23603664747 65% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328330608814 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.212126514561 0.103423049105 205% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.322635344954 0.0843802449381 382% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.32745948346 0.15604864568 210% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.388652214479 0.0819641961636 474% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.43 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.