The line graph shows the average number of weekly patients visiting four clinics of a hospital from 2010 to 2016.
The line graph compares the quantity of patients treated at four clinics in one hospital between 2010 and 2016.
Overall, the three categories of Eye, Birth Control, and Diabetic had an upward trend. The number of people who came for Eye check grew a lot since 2010. There was a slight rise in the number of patients going to birth control and diabetics.
At the Eye clinic, the number of patients increased from about 120 in 2010 and dramatically grown to 350 in 2016. Similarly, patients who travelled to Birth control clinic and diabetic clinic also rose in 2014. The number of people visiting the Birth Control clinic increased from 350 to 600, and the number of patients at the Diabetic clinic increased from 250 to 400.
By contrast, dental clinic patients showed a downward trend. In the period of time from 2010 to 2012 it fell from 100 patients to 50 patients. The number of patients slightly rose from 50 to 130 between 2012 and 2014, and remained until 2016.
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 67
- Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money What are the reasons and solutions for this issue 73
- The line graph compares the percentage of people living in four Asian counties in the world between 1970 and 2040
- Some people think that young people should be required to do unpaid work helping people in the community Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- People can eat a wide variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 69, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...atients showed a downward trend. In the period of time from 2010 to 2012 it fell from 100 pati...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, similarly, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 808.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.72514619883 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32786737586 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 85.0 106.607317073 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497076023392 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 214.2 283.868780488 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.397158938 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.8 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.9 5.23603664747 36% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.443350698254 0.215688989381 206% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.179535785193 0.103423049105 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107994575691 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274566517029 0.15604864568 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112058390388 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 13.2329268293 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.86 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.07 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.