The line graph shows changes in the per capita consumption of beef pork broilers and turkey in the United States between 1955 and 2012
The given chart details the statistical report comparing the amount of meat and poultry(in pounds) in relation to four boneless species that are consumed in the United States over a period of 57 years from 1955 to 2012.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over the period as a whole, the consumption of Broilers and Turkey witnessed substantial growth. However, despite being the most popular meat, Beef observed a downward trend during the last decade.
According to the given illustration, starting with nearly 60 pounds, Beef captured the entire market by a significant rise until 1976, reaching a peak of about 90 pounds. After that, a sharp decline, while possessing an erratic behavior, plunged the rate to a low of 50 pounds by the year-end. By contrast, at the start, Pork stood at just 50 pounds and slipped down by 10 pounds by the period ending after observing a few fluctuations.
On the other hand, Broiler and Turkey started at the lowest values of 20 and 5 pounds. However, whilst the former sky-rocketed to surpass the Beef, at just below 60 pounds, the latter leveled off until 1982 before experiencing a slight uptick, with nearly 12 pounds.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 78
- In some countries owning a house rather than renting is very important for people Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or a negative situation 78
- The diagrams below illustrate the early tools from 1 4 million years ago and 800 000 years ago Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 59
- The pie charts below show the online sales for retail sectors in New Zealand in 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 65
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 999.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.97014925373 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66356469171 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651741293532 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7085678942 43.030603864 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.875 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.125 22.9334400587 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 5.23603664747 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128312225561 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532733929559 0.103423049105 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0407927141275 0.0843802449381 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0784118616554 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0341940050847 0.0819641961636 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 61.2550243902 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.