The line graph shows changes in two-wheeler ownership between 1980 and 2010 in Singapore. The table shows the main method of travel to work in Singapore in 2010.
The given line graph shows a pattern of changes in two-wheeler segment ownership in the country of Singapore between 1980 and 2010.
Overall, it is quite evident from the given graph that the number of Singaporeans not owning a two two-wheeler decreased gradually in over 30 years. Furthermore, the percentage of households with two two-wheeler saw an uptick progressing in an upward trend with slight hiccups along the way from 180-2010.
Secondly, the trend of possessing one two-wheeler in Singapore was range-bound between 40% and 50%. Moreover, households having three two-wheeler also saw a similar condition of slow stagnant growth of merely under 10% over the years.
Additionally, people in Singapore keeping two two-wheeler saw an exponential increase over the years from a percentage below 10% to about 30% of the households having two two-wheelers and on the other hand, people with no two two-wheelers saw a steady regrowth from 60% plummeting to around 25% in the last 30 years.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, moreover, second, secondly, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 842.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.2625 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03353650876 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 70.2827622299 43.030603864 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 22.9334400587 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.3333333333 5.23603664747 216% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.310145833578 0.215688989381 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193907505705 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.18043353564 0.0843802449381 214% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.254453331367 0.15604864568 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.193255763796 0.0819641961636 236% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 61.2550243902 87% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.