The line graph illustrates information about business communication trends in New Stratford from 1980 to 2005.
In general, there are two basic general trends: downward and upward. Regarding the first, communication by letters was down over the period, decreasing almost tenfold from 19 million to 2 million. Furthermore, although landline phones underwent significant fluctuations reaching the peak of 35 million in 1990, then it dropped from 25 million to 22 million.
By contrast, the number of communications by the other three methods went up by varying degrees. They were hardly utilised until 1985, with less than 5 million of uses for each type. After that, emails and cell phones experienced a rapid growth to final 32 and 25 million respectively. Additionally, other ways of Internet communication were not in use until 1985, but then the number of conversations showed a steady rise ending the period up at approximately 8 million.
Overall, daily business conversations made by letters and landline phone calls were the major in the beginning of the period, while emails, cell phones and landline phones appeared to be most popular by the end of the period.
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. 11
- The charts illustrate the number of people who were affected by 4 types of noise pollution in day and night in cities and rural areas in 2007 69
- Some people are born to be the leaders others believe leadership can be learnt Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The chart below gives information on the percentage of Canadians gave money to charitable organisations by age range for the years 2000 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main f 100
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your opinion? 76
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, regarding, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 987.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00434930689 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 106.607317073 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.654255319149 0.547539520022 119% => OK
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4790905672 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.666666667 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8888888889 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.12994583356 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.068026368979 0.103423049105 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130051783711 0.0843802449381 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132433368087 0.15604864568 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.172960914692 0.0819641961636 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.66 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 40.7170731707 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.