The line graph shows the income of four cafes in New York over last year

The line graph describes the changes in the earnings of four different cafes in New York city over the previous year. Overall, there are basically two contrasting trends: downward and upward.

Regarding the former, the income for The Tea Room showed a wildly erratic yet evidently declining tendency. The cafe's monthly earnings plummeted from nearly $160000 to just around $50000 at the end of the year, with a dramatic falloff from October to December.

On the other hand, the income for the remaining cafes moved upwards in distinct patterns. There was a noticeable fluctuation in Cafe Cool's sales over the first eleven months, before a sudden escalation to $120000 at the year's end. Wifi Cafe's earnings per month experienced a somewhat similar growth, as during January-July period, it doubled to approximately $100000 from a beginning halved of that, followed by a slight drop to September then ending the year up by skyrocketing to more than $180000 in December. The increase for Internet Express's income was marginally reverse to WiFi Cafe's, since it gradually fell to under $80000 a month in June, and soon steadily climbed to about $130000.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, so, then, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 955.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 188.0 196.424390244 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07978723404 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70287850203 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64058647306 2.65546596893 99% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68085106383 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 287.1 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.0394401623 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.375 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.300407478038 0.215688989381 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12084584625 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.141251633087 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209406098557 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113443832733 0.0819641961636 138% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.48 11.4140731707 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.06136585366 115% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.