The line graph shows information about the consumption of three types of junk food by Australian adolescents between 1975 and 2000
The line graph shows information about the consumption of three types of junk food by Australian adolescents between 1975 and 2000.
Overall, it can be seen that there were significant upward trends in the consumption of hamburgers and pizza while the figure for fish and chips witnessed a considerable decline. And also, in 1975 fish and chips are consumed the most, but in 2000 the consumption of hamburgers was more than the other fast food.
In 1975, the usage of fish and chips was highest, at around 100 times eaten per year, while people ate hamburgers much less, at around 10 times. At the same time, the figure for pizza was much lower, at about 5 times. In 1995, the consumption of fish and chips rapidly fell, to about 50 times. By contrast, there were sharply rises in the usage of hamburgers and pizza, to about 100 times and 85 times respectively.
In 2000, there was a marginal increase in the consumption of hamburgers, finishing at around 11 times. Despite rising in 1995, the usage of pizza, then levelled off, at just 85 times. By contrast, the consumption of fish and chips continued its downward trend, to just under 40 times.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 958.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 201.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76616915423 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76529505866 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58823165414 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.512437810945 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 15.0 3.36585365854 446% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3055722748 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279162306869 0.215688989381 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150346678773 0.103423049105 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.286399916798 0.0843802449381 339% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310192919506 0.15604864568 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.39876984421 0.0819641961636 487% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.14 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.