The line graph gives information on, how many number of UK residents visited other countries and about overseas people visit to over the period from 1979 to 1999. The bar graph illustrates on the popular countries visited by UK people in 1999.
As can be seen from the graph it is clear that both the trends had increased over the period of time. The UK residents visiting aboard trend increased moderately from 12 millions to 20 millions , then it sharply improved from 20 millions to 3o millions in not more than 3 years and finally grown up gradually from 30 millions to approximately 52 millions over the period of time. The overseas visitors visiting UK trend had uplifted slightly till 1985, after that the trend increased gradually for about just below 30 millions.
As bar graph depicts, France is famous place visited by most of UK residents of about 11 million and less number of people visited Turkey. On other hand Spain, America and Greece stands in the next positions respectively.
To Recapitulate, the number of UK residents visited Overseas is more than the people visited UK and France is popular place visited by most of native UK People.
- The line graph shows the past and projected finances for a local authority in New Zealand 56
- The pie chart shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year. 84
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of employed persons by job type and sex for Australia in the year 2003. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement-making process, and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature, and make a comparision where releva 56
- The Bar graph bellow shows the Expenditure in Million Pounds on fast food items by income groups in UK. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
...he line graph gives information on, how many number of UK residents visited other countries...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ntries visited by UK people in 1999. As can be seen from the graph it is clear ...
^^
Line 3, column 87, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... both the trends had increased over the period of time. The UK residents visiting aboard trend...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 194, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...derately from 12 millions to 20 millions , then it sharply improved from 20 milli...
^^
Line 3, column 221, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o 20 millions , then it sharply improved from 20 millions to 3o millions in not m...
^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...s to approximately 52 millions over the period of time. The overseas visitors visiting UK tren...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 102, Rule ID: LESS_COMPARATIVE[1]
Message: Non-standard use of the comparative or superlative. Did you mean 'less numb'?
Suggestion: less numb
...of UK residents of about 11 million and less number of people visited Turkey. On other hand...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 969.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86934673367 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56210362788 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 289.8 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.5482997238 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.125 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.125 5.23603664747 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 3.70975609756 216% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.452205902095 0.215688989381 210% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232242957319 0.103423049105 225% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165507319586 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.31912595563 0.15604864568 205% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.146647967991 0.0819641961636 179% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.2329268293 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.