Line graph : wheat exports 1985 – 1990. (Canada, Australia, European community)
The figure elucidates the number of wheat exports in three different places from 1985 to 1990. At first glance, it is evident that the most noticeable changes occurred for the amount of wheat exports in Canada and it is measured in millions of tonnes.
To begin with, 1985 to 1990 witnessed a dramatic palpitation for the number of wheat exports in Canada in which it upright positioned at well under 20 in 1985 and terminated at just beneath sixty-thirds in 1990. Following a different pattern as Canada, European community experienced a significant decline between 1985, which made up at well under twenty-seconds, and 1986, which constituted at just beneath 75 in 5, and over the following 4 years, it uplifted tremendously to just across eighty-twentieth.
In accordance with Australia, there was a moderate upsurge in the total of the export of wheat in Australia in which it, initially, stood at 45 in 3 and peaked at just above 15 in 1986. Nevertheless, it dropped gradually, plunging to just above fifty-tenths by the end of the period shown.
- children today are too dependent on computer and electronic entertainment. It would be better for them to be outside playing sports and taking part in more traditional pastime than spending all day indoors. 73
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change. Others, however, think that change is always a good thing. 61
- Process : Life cycle of the silkworm. 56
- The graph shows Internet Usage in Taiwan by Age Group, 1998-2000. 84
- The maps : the plans below show the layout of a university’s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, nevertheless, second, third, well, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 880.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.97175141243 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08453880641 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581920903955 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 258.3 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 67.8906391846 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 112.824112599 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 5.23603664747 188% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.298276227132 0.215688989381 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146098437922 0.103423049105 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826949089618 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197612340742 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0614542886654 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 13.2329268293 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.14 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.