It is a disputable issue whether media coverage of celebrities is harming children. Important though celebrity reports may be a bad case, disparity learns about celebrities also could provide live textbooks to self-examination, such as self-reflection from celebrity's drinking behavior and stop drinking. All things considered, I do not fully agree with this opinion.
Admittedly, Children's nature makes them imitate others' behaviors and that in fact may lead them to be misled, which is would a negative effect on their growth. Concretely speaking, they are too young to distinguish right from wrong. The core of the problem is the weakness of judgment.
To begin with, the development of judgment requires experience as a basis. To some extent, the hand-on coverage from celebrities is the most vivid case. Parents with long-term vision will not keep their children in the greenhouse forever. On the contrary, they are good at educating children with real cases, which including negative cases of necessity. For example, my cousin Jennifer once was a big fan of Justin Bieber, who is a singer known for his wild behavior. Under his influence, Jennifer tends to rebellion at first, but a few months later, the local media reported that he was arrested for drug addiction, she feels hearts broken and ask her parents for help. Her father told her: Maybe Bieber has the talent for music, but having noble cultivation and self-control is the key to success, so Jennifer recognizes her mistakes and tries to think in a more ration way.
In addition，familiar with celebrity’s story are beneficial to independence. We should know that it would have taken a paragon of virtue not to fall into temptation. The object of media is to reveal the truth, whereas there do have some dark parts. If children could realize that the world is complex and sophisticated, individuals will always encounter numerous temptations. They will not be too naive and stand behind their parents all the time. By keeping in touch with the truth, they are more likely to deal with various things in the real world.
As the motto says, the way up and the way down is the same, depending on how you act. Despite exposure to some negative reports is a kind of risk to children, the positive parts are more dominant. By doing so, not only would it help them distinguish right from wrong but also conducive to independence.
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- TPO 37 Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well 76
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- Many people believe that media coverage of celebrities is having a negative effect on children To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, whereas, for example, in addition, in fact, kind of, such as, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 7.0 300% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 1.00243902439 1097% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 30.0 5.60731707317 535% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 33.7804878049 166% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 965.302439024 208% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 400.0 196.424390244 204% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0175 4.92477711251 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 3.73543355544 120% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86124863477 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 106.607317073 228% => Less unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6075 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 607.5 283.868780488 214% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 1.53170731707 653% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 8.94146341463 246% => Too many sentences.
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.438286605 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2272727273 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1818181818 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.59090909091 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 1.13902439024 878% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248663928171 0.215688989381 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0673382342709 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624278551478 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124668224423 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0590287979792 0.0819641961636 72% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.54 11.4140731707 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 40.7170731707 258% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.