The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The map represents the industrialization of the village of ryemouth from 1995 and present.

Overall, the maps illustrate the some changes in ryemouth Village. In 1995 map there was houses in the top right corner and in present map there are some modernisation, beside houses there was a road in present map reduced . In the 1995 map there was farmland in the earth of map but in present map replaced with golf area . Yet in 1995 map there was forest park but has now been replaced with tennis . So , the main road has not changed.
Moreover, we can see the shop in the 1995 map and near shop there was fish market but in present map have been replaced. The shop replaced with restaurant and fish market with apartments.
Furthermore in the north-eath there was hotel and near the hotel developed car park in present map .In additional in 1995 map there was sea in the bottom woth fishing pori but present map fishing pori reduced. Finally, neare the fish market there was cafe yet cafe has not changed

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 34, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...t. Overall, the maps illustrate the some changes in ryemouth Village. In 1995 ma...
^^^^
Line 3, column 223, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... there was a road in present map reduced . In the 1995 map there was farmland in t...
^^
Line 3, column 323, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...t in present map replaced with golf area . Yet in 1995 map there was forest park b...
^^
Line 3, column 401, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...rk but has now been replaced with tennis . So , the main road has not changed. M...
^^
Line 3, column 406, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t has now been replaced with tennis . So , the main road has not changed. Moreov...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Furthermore,
...rant and fish market with apartments. Furthermore in the north-eath there was hotel and n...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 99, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... hotel developed car park in present map .In additional in 1995 map there was sea ...
^^
Line 5, column 101, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...otel developed car park in present map .In additional in 1995 map there was sea in...
^^
Line 5, column 172, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... was sea in the bottom woth fishing pori but present map fishing pori reduced. Fi...
^^
Line 5, column 220, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esent map fishing pori reduced. Finally, neare the fish market there was cafe yet...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, moreover, so, as for, in addition

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 824.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60335195531 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47770674748 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 106.607317073 75% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.446927374302 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.7328431348 43.030603864 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.4 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 1.69756097561 589% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214545245472 0.215688989381 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107972487139 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0762877842356 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164540328962 0.15604864568 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0720855430977 0.0819641961636 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.2 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.1 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.