The map below shows an industrial area in the town of Norbiton, and planned future development of the site. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two maps compare the layout of Norbiton town's industrial area now and a project for this place in the future.
Overall, it can be seen that this industrial area will become a more residential one with all the factories being replaced by life amenities.
Looking closer at the maps, at the present, the area shares a border with a neighboring town in the west, while being separated with the agricultural land by a river running from east to west. In the middle of the map, there is a rotary with two exits, one of which leads toward the east of the area and the other is oriented toward the main road in the south.
In the future, two new exits will be linked to the roundabout. One headed northwest while the other go to the north, which will lead to a bridge cross the river to the new housing. It also means the reduction of the countryside left it with only a tiny area in the east. A tiny rotary will be added on the main road linking the larger rotary. All the factories will be demolished and replaced with housing and life amenities like medical center. There will also be a new school with a park nearby.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 84 | view |
| 2024-04-13 | 123456abcxyz | 56 | view |
| 2024-03-15 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2024-03-14 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-16 | 17142052@student.hcmute.edu.vn | 67 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36363636364 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31342557985 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3595433555 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904854265934 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407769970146 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495149204009 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788518526631 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554826262555 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 1.00243902439 698% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 912.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.36363636364 4.92477711251 89% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31342557985 2.65546596893 87% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511961722488 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3595433555 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.2 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904854265934 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0407769970146 0.103423049105 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0495149204009 0.0843802449381 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0788518526631 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0554826262555 0.0819641961636 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.01 11.4140731707 70% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.65 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.