The map below is of the town of Canterburry. A new school (S) is planned for the area. The map shows two possible sites for the school.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The picture depicts two proposed sites for a new school in Canterbury. Overall, one suggested location is in the countryside whereas the other one is in the center of the town.
Regarding the first site (S1), the school is planned to be out of the residential area, to the southeast of the university. As a result, it may take students longer time to commute from housing area to the school. However, the school will be located not far from the road to Sturry. This may facilitate the commuting of students from this town. If there are students coming from Chartham, which is 7 kilometers to the southwest, they would be able to reach the school by taking the main road that runs south to west of Canterbury.
As regards the second site (S2), it is suggested that the school will be in the town centre where there is no traffic zone. Therefore, parents would not be able to drive their children all the way to school. On the other hand, this location is closer to the housing area. This may lead to less time-consuming commuting of students living in the residential area. In addition, Sturry and Chartham will be relatively equidistant from the new school. As a result, it may be more accessible for students who are from these areas.
- The map below is of the town of Canterbury A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015 70
- The map below is of the town of Canterburry A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling center from 2011 to 2015
- The map below is of the town of Canterburry A new school S is planned for the area The map shows two possible sites for the school Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, therefore, whereas, as regards, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 1.00243902439 898% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.64545454545 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59823525615 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513636363636 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 1.53170731707 457% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.4761177614 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 78.6153846154 112.824112599 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9230769231 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.46153846154 5.23603664747 181% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202924925967 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0843982714625 0.103423049105 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653404295637 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158775635069 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206099358399 0.0819641961636 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 61.2550243902 118% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.39 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.52 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.