The presented map illustrates information about one of the towns of Canterbury, where is programmed to build a school accommodation. At first glance, this illustration demonstrates two available areas for the building.
As shown in the illustration S1 is located in the north-east of the region, in the countryside and nearby the railways. The Sturry, where almost 7000 people are living in the 5 km distance long. On the other hand, the university and living places are not far from the noticing place.
It can be seen that the chosen location, of S2, is in the centre of the town, where never has any traffic zone. The given area is near the main roads and residential areas, but it has a long-distance, about 7 km to Chartham, which has a population of 4500 and also is far away from the university.
In view of the map, the S1 is a suitable area to build a school because there is more than population and green space than S2.
- most people agree that money cannot be happiness why is happiness difficult to understand how can people achieve happiness 56
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 84
- The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full time or part time Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rel 67
- The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014 Summarise the informaiton by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 60
- The table below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ore than population and green space than S2.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 33.7804878049 68% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 769.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.60479041916 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86963201634 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.610778443114 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 234.0 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.9296124332 43.030603864 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.125 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 22.9334400587 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19642290157 0.215688989381 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0726032949366 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826019455553 0.0843802449381 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119084380461 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.110615025922 0.0819641961636 135% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 13.2329268293 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.4 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.56 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.